I don't see the point of the header.ds field. We already have header.d,
so why not just add header.s?
If there are two DKIM validations, the A-R header will look like this, no
confusion I can see:
Authentication-Results: example.com; ...
dkim=pass header.d=foo.com header.s=abc; header.b="A9hX4wGQ";
dkim=none header.d=bar.com header.s=def; header.b="4icXsmdd"; ...
Bonus question: so what would this mean?
Authentication-Results: example.com; ...
dkim=pass header.d=foo.com header.ds=bar.com,abc; header.b="A9hX4wGQ"; ...
Regards,
John Levine, [email protected], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
