On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 7:38 PM, John R. Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't see the point of the header.ds field. We already have header.d, > so why not just add header.s? > Yes, quite so. Please see my note from earlier this morning. header.s is already defined for 7601, we just need to indicate that it needs to be added into the A-R and AAR rather than leaving it to chance. --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
