On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 2:05 PM, Barry Leiba <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'd like to request a F2F meeting in London at IETF101. I plan to create > a > > WGLC-eligible draft as soon as the 7601bis-01 work lands in a form that > can > > be referenced by the protocol spec. > > > > Ideally we could launch WGLC for the ARC protocol before the end of > > February. > > Let's change that from "ideally" to a firm commitment, can we? Progress > hasn't been ideal, and we need to set schedules that we'll keep. > Still waiting for 7601bis-01 to be released (unless I've missed that notice). > > IETF101 would be a great opportunity to discuss the next steps for the > WG. > > I'm happy to have that time; I will request a one-hour session. Sounds good > I expect that we won't be spending any of that session time on the ARC > protocol document itself. We may want to chat a bit about the adjacent document for evolving signing algorithms but I think that the protocol doc should be settled. > Ideally (ah, there's that word...) we can spend some time reviewing early > results of using ARC in the field. > > In other words, let's see some implementations and find out how well this > works in practice. Sure - though I think we already have that info now and I'd be surprised to find any material changes in the next 6 weeks. There will be some discussions in SF at M3AAWG in a couple of weeks that may help to put the information into more readily consumable form. --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
