The previous version was an individual submission, so this is the -00 version for the working group.
I’m off to approve it now. b On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 10:33 PM Kurt Andersen (b) <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 9:53 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 8:53 AM, Kurt Andersen (b) <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 2:05 PM, Barry Leiba <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> > I'd like to request a F2F meeting in London at IETF101. I plan to >>>> create a >>>> > WGLC-eligible draft as soon as the 7601bis-01 work lands in a form >>>> that can >>>> > be referenced by the protocol spec. >>>> > >>>> > Ideally we could launch WGLC for the ARC protocol before the end of >>>> > February. >>>> >>>> Let's change that from "ideally" to a firm commitment, can we? Progress >>>> hasn't been ideal, and we need to set schedules that we'll keep. >>>> >>> >>> Still waiting for 7601bis-01 to be released (unless I've missed that >>> notice). >>> >> >> It's been sent to the datatracker and is awaiting WG chair approval as a >> WG document. >> > > I thought that only the initial version of a document required chair-bump. > Revisions to the documents have only taken author confirmation for me. > > --Kurt > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
