On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 7:51 AM, Hector Santos <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I believe the intent of the domain is his published policy record. If a > restrictive policy is published, the receiver should not presume it did not > mean it. When failure is detected, the author domain with a restrictive > policy is given the world permission to treated it harshly. That also makes the extremely strong presumption that the publisher of said record is both authorized to make those representations, and full aware of the effects across the entire usage space that will be affected by the record. As RFC7960 and lots of pain with SPF has demonstrated, such coincidences are painfully rare - to the point where, as much as I would like to think otherwise, I have to assume incompetence. --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
