In article <CAD2i3WMWaQ7RKGesphwFAu=YVa3pTNKbpKuA46kUL1C1=+v...@mail.gmail.com> you write: >> It doesn't say that in 4.1.2, even though it's sort of implicit since >> i= means something else. I'd say so explicitly in a fifth bullet >> after where it says "three (3) differences." > >One of those differences says: > >* the presence of the “instance tag”. Additional information on the >“instance tag” can be found in Section 4.2.1. The instance tag replaces the >DKIM “AUID” tag; > >This language could probably be cleaned up to say "the 'i' (AUID) tag is >not imported from DKIM. Instead, it is replaced by the "instance tag" as >defined in Section 4.2.1" > >Then section 4.1.3 should use the identical language as well.
Please do. Experience tells us that the more clearly you lay something out, the less likely we are to screw it up. I don't remember what AUID is without looking it up but i= is obvious. R's, John PS: There's still four bullets after the three (3) differences. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
