On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 17:26 John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: > In article <CAD2i3WMWaQ7RKGesphwFAu=YVa3pTNKbpKuA46kUL1C1=+ > v...@mail.gmail.com> you write: > >> It doesn't say that in 4.1.2, even though it's sort of implicit since > >> i= means something else. I'd say so explicitly in a fifth bullet > >> after where it says "three (3) differences." > > > >One of those differences says: > > > >* the presence of the “instance tag”. Additional information on the > >“instance tag” can be found in Section 4.2.1. The instance tag replaces > the > >DKIM “AUID” tag; > > > >This language could probably be cleaned up to say "the 'i' (AUID) tag is > >not imported from DKIM. Instead, it is replaced by the "instance tag" as > >defined in Section 4.2.1" > > > >Then section 4.1.3 should use the identical language as well. > > Please do. Experience tells us that the more clearly you lay something > out, the > less likely we are to screw it up. I don't remember what AUID is without > looking > it up but i= is obvious.
Done. > > PS: There's still four bullets after the three (3) differences. Yeah, I noticed and fixed that, too. S -- Seth Blank | Director of Industry Initiatives E: s...@valimail.com | P: 415.273.8818
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
