> The Phase I description is still included: "Draft description of
> interoperability issues for indirect mail..." Isn't that rfc7960?
Yeh, we did this too quickly, I'm afraid. We should make a few other
minor changes to reflect the now-past:
OLD
The existing DMARC base specification has been submitted as an
Independent Submission to become an Informational RFC.
NEW
The existing DMARC base specification is published as Informational
RFC 7489.
END
OLD
Draft description of interoperability issues for indirect mail
flows and plausible methods for reducing them.
NEW
Draft description of interoperability issues for indirect mail
flows and plausible methods for reducing them. This is now
complete and published as RFC 7960.
END
OLD
Specification of DMARC improvements to support indirect mail flows
NEW
Specification of DMARC improvements to support indirect mail flows;
this is now complete as draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol
END
Alexey, will you make those changes, please?
--
Barry
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
