I applied these changes. Thank you, Barry! On Tue, Nov 20, 2018, at 8:44 PM, Barry Leiba wrote: > > The Phase I description is still included: "Draft description of > > interoperability issues for indirect mail..." Isn't that rfc7960? > > Yeh, we did this too quickly, I'm afraid. We should make a few other > minor changes to reflect the now-past: > > OLD > The existing DMARC base specification has been submitted as an > Independent Submission to become an Informational RFC. > NEW > The existing DMARC base specification is published as Informational > RFC 7489. > END > > OLD > Draft description of interoperability issues for indirect mail > flows and plausible methods for reducing them. > NEW > Draft description of interoperability issues for indirect mail > flows and plausible methods for reducing them. This is now > complete and published as RFC 7960. > END > > OLD > Specification of DMARC improvements to support indirect mail flows > NEW > Specification of DMARC improvements to support indirect mail flows; > this is now complete as draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol > END > > Alexey, will you make those changes, please? > -- > Barry >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
