On Friday, March 29, 2019 05:14:31 PM Ian Levy wrote: > * The working group should, in the short term, focus on development and > completion of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd. Among the questions to be answered is > its urgency > I’m certainly keen to see that progressed. As we’ve rolled out DMARC across > gov.uk subdomains, we’ve seen criminal behaviours change in response. Some > of you may recall we asked for help a while ago for ideas in generating > SPF/DMARC records for non-existent subdomains. Well, that’s running and we > answered 430,000 queries for them between August and November last year > (more current data coming). We do know that the effect of synthesising > these records means that some receivers don’t honour them, so getting a > more acceptable way of controlling subdomains of a PSD would be good. As we > push for wider DMARC adoption and other authentication measures, we’ll need > to do this much more widely so it needs to be easy. > I’ll also offer gov.uk as an experimental ground (within reason!).
Excellent. I've listed it in the experimental registry at psddmarc.org. Since you already had a live DMARC record for that domain, people can experiment with this now. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
