On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 4:01 AM Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote:
> Appendix D1 of rfc7208 mentions DNSWL as a way to mitigate SPF's > reject-on-fail. The score attributed to the sender by a trusted DNSWL is > also > useful after DATA, thence the need to store that value for downstream > filters. > > However, as an authentication method, a DNSWL TXT response can provide a > domain > name, which is possibly aligned with From:. In that sense, this method > might > be of interest for this WG. Probably not, but I felt compelled to make > sure > before trying independent submission. (Already tried ART.) The I-D is > here: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vesely-authmethod-dnswl > With my Designated Expert hat on and co-chair hat off, a procedural point here: The IANA registry for these is Expert Review, which means you don't have to publish an RFC to get it registered. You can, but it's not necessary if your registration request can sufficiently describe what you're doing. See RFC8601 Section 6.2, fourth paragraph. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
