On Thursday, July 11, 2019 6:07:50 AM EDT Alessandro Vesely wrote: > > 2. If explicit call outs to ICANN/limited operator capacity to > > implement are needed > > Appendix B.1 lacks a criterion to establish enlisting. Couldn't we > require an explicit statement about seizing DMARC reports in, say, the > delegation report? Alternatively, that policy can be stated in a > well-known place under the delegation services URL, so that > registrants know what they do.
It's in the appendix because we don't have a clear path forward. This is part of the experiment. We need to be careful though since different PSDs operate under different authorities and controls, so there is a point beyond which it's not the IETF that decides. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
