On Friday, July 12, 2019 1:26:40 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 5:21:14 PM EDT Seth Blank wrote: > > As Secretary, there are three items that have not yet reached consensus > > that must be resolved during WGLC: > > > > 1. What further context is needed in the introduction > > The only comment on this so far during WGLC is that it is clear as is. > > As the document author, this is one I have a hard time assessing. It's > clear to me, but I know what I meant when I wrote it. If anyone is still > concerned about this issue, I would strong encourage you to provide > suggested text. > > I think the WG should be pretty open to accepting such changes (as long as > they are technically accurate). Even if it makes the document a bit longer, > I think clarity is worth it. > > Standing by for inputs/feedback.
I think Tim's suggestions are a good response to this issue: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/e7aDFcxDdJPI2Sj4jMqGLmDhmKc Unless someone else has other opinions (I know Kurt brought some things up that this doesn't cover, but we should address those separately), I think these changes should be applied. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
