On Monday, July 29, 2019 3:37:55 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote: > I'd like to add the option to record DMARC results in an A-R header field > for consumption by a downstream processor. I think it would be something > like this: > > Authentication-Results: mail-router.example.net; dmarc=pass > header.from=example.com policy.dmarc=none > > That would take adding an entry in the Email Authentication Methods registry > for: > > method: dmarc > ptype: policy > value: dmarc > > Does that make sense as a way to do it? Does anyone have alternative > suggestions?
I think comments should be free-form. If we want data that can be machine parsed, we should specify it. I think the above works in ABNF terms. It's: Authentication-Results:" authserv-id; method=result ptype.property=value ptype.property=value According to the ABNF, there can be more than one propspec (ptype.property=value) per methodspec in resinfo, so I think it's legal. It would just need the new registry values for dmarc. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
