On Tue 30/Jul/2019 15:56:16 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote: > The published policy (that's why I suggest dmarc.policy).
Published policy can be ambiguous. Say you have p=quarantine; sp=none. The MTA chooses which to apply based on the domains (publishing and From:). So it makes sense to write the /applied/ published policy. I'm not good at designing A-R stanzas, as you know. However, since dmarc is already the policy method, why not write dns.policy, since that is where it comes from? > I'm not sure if disposition belongs in A-R. If it does, it'd be a local > policy override, probably policy.dmarc as described now in RFC 8616. You mean RFC 7489, don't you? I see nothing about A-R in RFC 8616. Would it be possible to add a result of "quarantine"? Having dmarc=fail and dns.policy=quarantine leaves a good deal of interpretation to the MDA. If one could write dmarc=quarantine, a simple string search or regular expression would do. Currently, I use a comment too. Since we're at it, besides the spam folder, is it fine if the MDA sets IMAP keyword $Junk[*] or $Phishing[†] or would we dare registering a new one? Best Ale -- [*] https://www.iana.org/assignments/imap-jmap-keywords/junk/junk-template [†] https://www.iana.org/assignments/imap-jmap-keywords/phishing/phishing-template _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
