Thanks Kurt, I’ve made the adjustments to the document.
--Freddie Leeman Van: Kurt Andersen (b) [mailto:[email protected]] Verzonden: woensdag 31 juli 2019 17:00 Aan: Freddie Leeman <[email protected]> CC: [email protected] Onderwerp: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC aggregate reports XML Schema inconsistencies On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 2:47 AM Freddie Leeman <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: I’ve been processing millions of DMARC aggregate reports from a lot of different organizations, and have been trying to make sense of them for quite some time now. I’ve noticed that most of them, even those from large parties like Google and Yahoo!, fail to follow the DMARC RFC guidelines (Appendix C. DMARC XML Schema). I’ve written a blog about this that can be found here: https://www.uriports.com/blog/dmarc-reports-ietf-rfc-compliance/ The bottom line is that the RFC 7489 Appendix C is a mess and contradicts itself numerous times in both schema and comments. I think it’s important to be clearer and stricter about the xml elements and their values. Too much of this section is open to interpretation. Freddie, Thanks for your observations - would you mind proposing concrete language to replace Appendix C? Speaking from experience, it can be helpful to be able to do in-place comments/markup so I've posted http://bit.ly/dmarc-rpt-schema - please make any adjustments in "Suggest" mode or comments you feel appropriate. The invitation extends to all members of this group. --Kurt Andersen
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
