These changes make sense to me. On Sat, 24 Aug 2019, at 2:09 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > Hi all, > > I made some more adjustments, including the addition of a 1-record example > report. By properly setting the attributes of the feedback element, the > version can be parsed by generic xml tools and doesn't need to be written as > an > element. > > I bumped the version to "http://dmarc.org/dmarc-xml/0.2";. I think we all agree > that some changes are necessary. > > > Best > Ale > > > > On Wed 31/Jul/2019 17:42:12 +0200 Freddie Leeman wrote: > > Thanks Kurt, I’ve made the adjustments to the document. > > [...] > > > > Van: Kurt Andersen (b) [mailto:[email protected]] > > Verzonden: woensdag 31 juli 2019 17:00 > > [...] > > > > Speaking from experience, it can be helpful to be able to do in-place > > comments/markup so I've posted http://bit.ly/dmarc-rpt-schema - please make > > any adjustments in "Suggest" mode or comments you feel appropriate.. The > > invitation extends to all members of this group. > > > > > > > > --Kurt Andersen > > -- > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >
-- Marc Bradshaw marcbradshaw.net | @marcbradshaw <https://twitter.com/marcbradshaw>
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
