On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 12:38 PM Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'd like to add the option to record DMARC results in an A-R header field > for > consumption by a downstream processor. I think it would be something like > this: > > Authentication-Results: mail-router.example.net; dmarc=pass > header.from=example.com policy.dmarc=none > > That would take adding an entry in the Email Authentication Methods > registry > for: > > method: dmarc > ptype: policy > value: dmarc > > Does that make sense as a way to do it? Does anyone have alternative > suggestions? > This seems sane to me, or at least neither an objection nor a better idea came to mind. :-) I concur with whoever disagreed with doing it in comments as a normative thing meant for downstream processing. IMO, comments in header fields are meant for debugging done by things in meat-space. -MSK, hatless
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
