On Tuesday, September 24, 2019 10:16:08 AM EDT Alessandro Vesely wrote: > Hi all, > I added psddmarc to the latest zdkimfilter. > > After some thought, I chose to use and distribute a file like the one > attached. Two reasons for doing so are as follows: > > 1. Avoid to invent yet another file format, specifying header line, initial > dot, comments, and the like. > > 2. Reuse the library calls already available for parsing and searching the > PSL. > > On the second call, the software passes the organizational domain resulting > from the first call, and thus retrieves the "super organizational" domain, > if any. The file only contains the domain from psddmarc.org registry which > actually sports a DMARC record. While the experiment is ongoing, the file > will have to be updated. > > It would be convenient, if more implementations will find the above reasons > convincing, if such a list would be maintained and distributed by > psddmarc.org along with (or instead of) the csv format. After all, since > this list extends the PSL, keeping the same format may make some sense.
I think we should include this in the options for the experiment about how to keep track of which PSDs are doing PSD DMARC. Can you provide what you'd like me to add about your implementation for Appendix C? Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
