On Wed 25/Sep/2019 23:23:04 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 24, 2019 10:16:08 AM EDT Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I added psddmarc to the latest zdkimfilter.
>>
>> After some thought, I chose to use and distribute a file like the one
>> attached. Two reasons for doing so are as follows:
>>
>> 1. Avoid to invent yet another file format, specifying header line, initial
>> dot, comments, and the like.
>>
>> 2. Reuse the library calls already available for parsing and searching the
>> PSL.
>>
>> On the second call, the software passes the organizational domain resulting
>> from the first call, and thus retrieves the "super organizational" domain,
>> if any. The file only contains the domain from psddmarc.org registry which
>> actually sports a DMARC record. While the experiment is ongoing, the file
>> will have to be updated.
>>
>> It would be convenient, if more implementations will find the above reasons
>> convincing, if such a list would be maintained and distributed by
>> psddmarc.org along with (or instead of) the csv format. After all, since
>> this list extends the PSL, keeping the same format may make some sense.
>
> I think we should include this in the options for the experiment about how to
> keep track of which PSDs are doing PSD DMARC.
>
> Can you provide what you'd like me to add about your implementation for
> Appendix C?
If needed, a short characterization can be as follows:
The zdkimfilter module is a separately available add-on to
Courier-MTA.
Mostly used for DKIM signing, it can be configured to also
verify, apply DMARC policies, and send aggregate reports.
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
