On June 8, 2020 2:35:28 AM UTC, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>,
>Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>How about saying that reports MUST include the key used to evaluate
>>>the DMARC status, if there was one, and SHOULD include all DKIM keys
>>>evaluated.
>>>
>>>The other ones can be useful, e.g., mailing lists usually resign
>their
>>>outgoing mail so if you have an idea what what lists are sending you
>>>mail, that gives you a strong hint that a DMARC failure is due to
>mail
>>>from a list.
>>
>>When you say 'include the key', do you mean put the literal public key
>in the report or the selector
>>which, in combination with the signing domain, tells one where to find
>the record in DNS?
>
>Sorry, domain and selector.
Thanks for clarifying. I think that makes sense.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
