On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 2:56 PM Seth Blank <seth= 40valimail....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> The original question in this thread had two parts: > > "Is it desirable to clarify this language, [1] such that it is clear which > DKIM keys are required to include in a report, and [2] if so, how should > the appropriate keys be determined?" > > I hear consensus on [1], that the domain and selector of the key used to > evaluate the DMARC status MUST be included, but on [2] there is not yet > clear consensus. > > Does anyone have thoughts on [2] beyond Ale's comments? Otherwise, we can > separate the conversation on [2] and return to it later. > Sounds like a good approach - I'd suggest forking [2] into a separate TRAC issue and closing this one out with a pointer to the new "subissue". --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
