On 6/11/20 5:22 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On June 11, 2020 6:28:13 PM UTC, Steven M Jones<[email protected]> wrote:
... I also suggested that perhaps potential failure report generators
would be encouraged if they could see examples of reports with
different levels of redaction.
I think it's entirely sensible to assess demand before investing a lot of time
in this. ... I think the real question on this issue is for receivers. Is
there anyone working that side of the equation that would be inspired to send
some kind of limited feedback report where they send none now is they had
clearer examples to work from.
I should have said "I speculated," I suppose... While listening to
Autumn I couldn't recall having seen such examples, so I threw the idea
out there.
Anyway yes, we should be guided by data where we can get it. But if
we're looking for something better than "anecdata," at the moment I can
only imagine getting that through a careful survey of a large number of
non-reporting receivers. And I don't see that happening unless it covers
a lot more questions than just whether examples of redacted failure
reports would have changed the decision not to send failure reports...
If there's no sense that it would be useful, no need for further discussion.
--S.
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
