On Sunday, June 14, 2020 5:24:42 AM EDT [email protected] wrote: > Le 13/06/2020 à 17:19, Douglas E. Foster a écrit : > > About this comment > > > > If you teach users that "Joe User by Random Intermediary" is the same > > as "Joe User", this expectation is doomed.> > > Based on the response to my previous post, "Trained User" is not a > > meaningful concept, for purposes of this discussion [...] > > That's not my point. My point is: this working group needs to make a > determination whether From addresses being displayed to the users > matters to DMARC or not, and then follow up consistently. > > If it is, then don't break From addresses with munging. > > If it is not, then use Sender field as a fallback for alignment, and > don't break From either.
I don't think that's the question at all. Whether user's knowledge of the from address has any bearing on anti-abuse methods or not, it has plenty of value for other purposes. DMARC is not all of email. >From rewriting is a gross hack that exists only due to dire necessity. If this working group can't move the space towards a more usable solution, I'm not at all sure DMARCbis is worth the trouble. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
