On 14/07/2020 19:30, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 7/14/2020 10:25 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
If regleissei.icu publishes a DMARC record and indicates support for use of
Sender:, per the proposal, please explain exactly what bad things will
happen, in the case you offer.
...
I can enable DMARC on all .bank, and tell users to painstakingly check From:,
and if they get phished I can tell them they're morons.
Forgive me, but I do not understand how your note, in any way, responded to the
substance of my query.
The bad thing is that _dmarc.fm.bank looses the effect of stopping phishing
attempts, as the Sender: domain would override. It keeps the ability to
generate feedback about authentic messages, though.
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
