Gmail specifies quarantine. Verizon.com, aol.com, and yahoo.com (common ownership) specify reject, reject, and quarantine respectively.
Microsoft (live and Hotmail) specify none. Embarqmail specifies none. Which services did you check? -----Original Message----- From: dmarc [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Benny Lyne Amorsen Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2020 8:17 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> writes: > On 15/07/2020 10:25, Benny Lyne Amorsen wrote: >> At the other end of the spectrum, domains which never ever >> participate in mailing lists or mail forwarding need some kind of >> "p=reject-yes-really-I-mean-it", to stop recipients from ignoring the >> policy. > > The domain owner doesn't know. It's his users that want to sign up > for, and send to, MLs. Who should be in control? The domain owner is already (mostly) in control. They will generally have authority over the email servers, which allows e.g. blocking all mail with a mailing list header. If the users do not like that policy, they will have to vote with their feet and send mail from a different domain. I do not imagine that any of the major "free" email domains will post "p=reject-yes-I-really-mean-it" policies, so it is not a terrible hardship. I checked a few of the major free email domains, they post p=none at present. When that is the case and when they apply their own judgement to p=reject and p=quarantine, what is the actual value of current DMARC? _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
