On Fri 14/Aug/2020 21:08:56 +0200 Jim Fenton wrote:
If the Sender header field is to be used by DMARC in the manner described in this draft, it should be an integral part of the DMARCbis specification rather than a separate extension to it. In other words, this should be an issue on the DMARC WG issue tracker rather than a working group draft (and presumably eventual RFC). There are enough different combinations of originators and receivers that might use Sender (which the chart in Section 2 begins to describe) that we don't need the ongoing ambiguity of whether the receiver does or does not implement this as an extension.
100% agreed. However, since I haven't yet understood how exactly the spec is going to be split among various I-Ds, I voted for adoption in order to boost discussion.
Best Ale -- _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
