If DMARC wasn't experimental, maybe I could see adding it separately,
but this seems like a fairly fundamental change and shouldn't just be
a bolt-on
Without suggesting a preference, it's worth considering nature/implication:
1. Separate
DMARCbis is likely to be small changes on the existing spec and
incorporation of something like my draft's changes could a)
destablilize the effort, and b) make the bis effort take significantly
longer. Also, my proposal is a lot more fragile than the base DMARC
spec, both in terms of possible technical issue and possible operational
issues.
2. Integrated
Merging them makes it more likely that the result really is
integrated and seamless.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
