In article <CAL0qLwaip0fzXpqnK=XTcEELZRat_gnjuEGZYj=8qgy3wky...@mail.gmail.com> you write: >> message. If the intermediary DKIM signs the modified message with their own >> signature, that provides some assurance to the receiver. > >You mean like https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-levine-dkim-conditional-00? > >I'm pretty sure that got implemented too, but I can't recall now if it ever >shipped.
I don't think it ever did. It has the scaling problem of every system that sends to mailing lists having to decide what mail it's willing to have re-signed and what domain the second signature will use. Usually it's the domain name of the list except when it's not. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
