I'm sorry this came up during a period when I wasn't following the list.  
Having caught up recently, I completely agree with the allusions to Sender ID.  
I don't think this his helpful.  If something like this is going to be 
standardized, it shouldn't be called DMARC because it's not.

Scott K

On Friday, September 25, 2020 2:59:42 PM EDT Tim Wicinski wrote:
> Dave Crocker reminded me that we were going to adopt this document as
> Experimental. I was remiss in not mentioning that.
> 
> Even though the WG adopted this document, it was said during the call that
> the WG may not be able to come to a consensus to move the document
> forward.   Adoption does not mean published (see: ARC Usage).
> 
> tim
> 
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 10:01 AM Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > All
> > 
> > This call for adoption ended a few weeks ago, I have been recalcitrant in
> > following up.   The chairs feel
> > there is enough consensus to adopt this work in DMARC.   While there were
> > issues raised, the chairs feel
> > they can be addressed through the document process.
> > 
> > thanks
> > tim
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 2:00 AM Hector Santos <hsantos=
> > 
> > 40isdg....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> >> On 8/21/2020 3:09 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
> >> > On 8/15/20 3:53 PM, John Levine wrote:
> >> >> Assurances that are provided by ADSP are generally obtained out of
> >> 
> >> band in the
> >> 
> >> >> real Internet, and not through ADSP.  Current deployment of ADSP is
> >> >> not
> >> >> recommended.
> >> > 
> >> > Is that not exactly the same situation with DMARC, except that the
> >> > policy in question now is "reject" rather than "discardable"? Yes,
> >> > it's just a keyword, but it reflects the semantics of the expected
> >> > action as well.
> >> > 
> >> > -Jim
> >> 
> >> No one was expected to follow a reject, so it was said, until it did
> >> happen.  SPF pushed
> >> 
> >> --
> >> Hector Santos,
> >> https://secure.santronics.com
> >> https://twitter.com/hectorsantos
> >> 
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> dmarc mailing list
> >> dmarc@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc




_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to