On 9/26/2020 7:23 PM, Seth Blank wrote:
The goal of DMARCbis is to take the independent stream informational RFC 7489 and drive it to an IETF stream standards track document that represents IETF consensus. So this work is explicitly around DMARC as a protocol that describes how a domain owner transmits its policy for mail that does not authenticate to a mail receiver. Further, our charter takes the usefulness of DMARC in its current form as table stakes, and (to paraphrase) primarily focuses our discussion around addressing limitations or operational concerns of the protocol. One of the primary limitations of DMARC is when mail transits through a forwarder that breaks authentication. For DMARC to go standards track, this issue must be addressed. Currently ARC is the approved experiment from Phase 2 of our Charter. Seth, as Chair
Thanks for the summary. Are any of authorized third party proposals on the table?
-- Hector Santos, https://secure.santronics.com https://twitter.com/hectorsantos _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
