In article <[email protected]> you write: >If ARC is advocating for a bypass of p=reject that introduces a new >state. If my policy is reject, I want you to reject the mail. If I want >you to reject the mail unless you think it has come from an acceptable >place with receipts, then you need a new policy tag like >reject-except-valid-arc.
Other people will have to speak for themselves but on my system a) I don't believe you. 2) I don't care. I think you will find this reaction pretty common. I see lots of mail going through my system like the stuff I described for the town clerk. It is obvious who it is intended for, the only way to deliver it to that recipient is to forward it, and if the DMARC policy says not to do that, the policy is wrong. I don't even need ARC for that, although ARC can be useful for mail that takes indirect routes for the mailing lists they subscribe to. You can say, no I am smarter than those guys and I REALLY REALLY mean it, but see 2) above. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
