On 12/5/20 3:10 PM, John Levine wrote:
In article <[email protected]> you write:
If ARC is advocating for a bypass of p=reject that introduces a new
state. If my policy is reject, I want you to reject the mail. If I want
you to reject the mail unless you think it has come from an acceptable
place with receipts, then you need a new policy tag like
reject-except-valid-arc.
Other people will have to speak for themselves but on my system
a) I don't believe you.
2) I don't care.
I think you will find this reaction pretty common.
I see lots of mail going through my system like the stuff I described
for the town clerk. It is obvious who it is intended for, the only way
to deliver it to that recipient is to forward it, and if the DMARC
policy says not to do that, the policy is wrong. I don't even need ARC
for that, although ARC can be useful for mail that takes indirect
routes for the mailing lists they subscribe to.
You can say, no I am smarter than those guys and I REALLY REALLY mean
it, but see 2) above.
Can you keep your contempt for me off this list? This is not even
responsive to what I wrote, and is nothing more than an ad hominem.
And your anecdotal evidence drawn from a tiny system is very suspect.
Mike
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
