On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 9:24 PM Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > An idea that i've been rolling around in my head is that the MLM could > give a sed-like script to rollback the changes. since they know their > modifications, they can obviously express how to unmodify them. it may have > less issue with the mime hackery you were thinking about. >
You'd need a way to assert, and then evaluate, that something equivalent to "s/.*/spam/g" is a transformation you're not willing to reverse and say "yep, we're good." I don't know how you'd go about automating that. > But as far as your point about spam vectors it is surely just as true > about ARC, right? at least with recovering the original text i have the > ability to remove all of the transforms and deliver the original text. ARC > not so much. it's all or nothing on the trust front. > > But I really think the key thing about all of this is figuring out what > defines success. That is the most important thing by far. > I think ARC, like PSD, is meant to run for a while and see what we've learned from it. Maybe it's the silver bullet, or maybe it's ineffective complexity. That should be part of the experiment's definition; Section 11 of the ARC RFC does try to capture all of that. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
