On Mon 07/Dec/2020 06:05:29 +0100 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
A counter-argument I've heard often to the idea of reversible transformations is that it can become a spam vector, no different than the argument against "l=".
Compared with the use of "l=" tag (Section 8.2 of [RFC6376]), the fact that footers are written in plain text removes the main security objection about footer additions. Namely, footers cannot completely replace the original content in the end recipient's eyes by exploiting lax HTML parsing in the MUA. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vesely-dmarc-mlm-transform-00#section-6 Best Ale -- _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
