There are a number of open issues and you open more. https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/report/1
I think it is being serialized for lack of people and also WG energy. tim On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 8:20 PM Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 12/7/20 5:15 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote: > > > A good section of our charter is collection Operational experiences. Doing > an Operational BCP on DMARC based on data collected is what the WG should > do after DMARC-bis. > > I guess I don't understand why this should be serialized. When I read over > DMARC I completely recognized ADSP/SSP with the addition of SPF policy and > reporting. I wouldn't expect a whole lot of changes beyond wordsmithing and > some nits around the edges. If this is really because large mail providers > have started using p=reject, that seems to be pushing off the actual > payload way down the line. Standards track is not going to change this > much, IMO. > > Mike > >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
