On 12/30/20 7:06 AM, Laura Atkins wrote:
The auth-res result posted as an example of DMARC failing earlier in
this thread:
Authentication-Results:mx.google.com <http://mx.google.com>;
[email protected] header.s=ietf1 header.b=aayvF8Pg;
[email protected] header.s=ietf1 header.b="PwU4/yuQ";
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify)[email protected]
header.s=201712 header.b=PRr8Q7Zv;
spf=pass (google.com <http://google.com>: domain
[email protected] designates 4.31.198.44 as permitted
sender)[email protected];
dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=mrochek.com
<http://mrochek.com>
The policy statement is right there: p=NONE.
No. That is not guaranteed whatsoever. It could say "(eat at Joe's)" and
be valid.
Mike
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
