On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 12:34 PM Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Todd clearly said that a mailbox provider currently has to resort to > temporary > header fields in order to communicate results of authentication checks to > a > downstream, non-standard agent. Perhaps like so: > > I know we're supposed to let this thread die, but I wanted to clarify something here. It was not my intent to say "a mailbox provider has to resort to temporary header fields in order to communicate results..." What I was trying to say is "Absent our working for a given mailbox provider, we don't know which header(s) are used by the mailbox provider to convey message disposition and display information to their MDAs and UIs." I apologize for the confusion. -- *Todd Herr* | Sr. Technical Program Manager *e:* [email protected] *p:* 703.220.4153 This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
