On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 3:29 AM Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat 23/Jan/2021 01:55:05 +0100 Kurt Andersen (b) wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:06 PM Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Here's the paragraph in question > >> > >> <t>To determine the organizational domain for a message under > evaluation, > >> and thus where to look for a policy statement, DMARC makes use > of a Public Suffix > >> List. The process for doing this can be found in Section 3.2 of > the DMARC > >> specification.</t> > >> > > > > The concern that I have with this wording is that it is (potentially) > > misleading. "How" DMARC determines the org domain does not matter at all > to > > this spec. The important point is that we go to "org-1" in the tree for > > this extra lookup. > > +1. If we don't assume that readers already know what the PSL is, trying > to > establish that context in the Introduction is only a complication. Later > on, > when Section 3 explains technicalities, the PSL has full citizenship. > In the interest of getting this done finally, could you or Kurt please propose specific changes, maybe in OLD/NEW form, that you think fixes the problem? -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
