Kurt Since this is an experiment, Appendix A discusses the updates that happen. we don't actually say explicitly "if the experiment is a success, the following changes will be made" and perhaps I should add some wording like that.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 7:58 PM Kurt Andersen (b) <kb...@drkurt.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 4:57 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 4:55 PM Kurt Andersen (b) <kb...@drkurt.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:06 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Here's the paragraph in question >>>> >>>> <t>To determine the organizational domain for a message under >>>> evaluation, >>>> and thus where to look for a policy statement, DMARC makes use >>>> of a Public Suffix >>>> List. The process for doing this can be found in Section 3.2 of >>>> the DMARC >>>> specification.</t> >>>> >>> >>> The concern that I have with this wording is that it is (potentially) >>> misleading. "How" DMARC determines the org domain does not matter at all to >>> this spec. The important point is that we go to "org-1" in the tree for >>> this extra lookup. >>> >> >> This is just establishing context for why we're doing what the rest of >> the document says (i.e., what problem we're solving). Leaving this out >> seems to me to paint an incomplete picture; Section 3 basically describes a >> delta, but a delta to what? >> > > And if DMARC changes how it determines the org domain, where does that > leave this spec? > > --Kurt >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
