In article <[email protected]> you write: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >On 1/27/2021 7:17 PM, Steven M Jones wrote: >> 3.3. Transport >> >> Email streams carrying DMARC failure reports MUST conform to the >> DMARC mechanism, thereby resulting in an aligned "pass".
>Mostly this will discourage reporting. Legitimate reporting. It's been like this for a decade. >Consider the challenges to ensuring a DMARC pass. Looking at the results I get (and understanding that the results that arrive via private agreements are likely different), I get reports from linkedin.com and seznam.cz that are aligned via SPF and are DMARC reject and none, respectively, and from antispamcloud.com that are totally broken, not even multipart/report. I find it hard to believe that if you are going to enough effort to maintain the data to create and send reports, you can't figure out how to install an SPF record for your reporting domain. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
