In article <[email protected]> you write: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >On 2/1/2021 10:08 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >> On Mon 01/Feb/2021 17:38:07 +0100 Dave Crocker wrote: >>> Consider the challenges to ensuring a DMARC pass. That's a pretty >>> high barrier to entry against generating reports. >> >> Well, if a mail site is unable to get a DMARC pass, they have more >> urgent problems to solve than setting up aggregate report generation. > > >No, they probably don't have more urgent problems. Sites choose not to >adopt DMARC for a variety of reasons. It's probably a good idea to >respect that variety. > >The model that a receiving site is not allowed to report DMARC traffic >unless that site is also generating DMARC authentication is >Procrustean. And as I noted, is likely counter-productive.
Ah, we have a semantic question. I consider a message with p=none to be aligned. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
