It looks right to me. Thanks, Tim. Barry
On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 4:53 PM Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote: > I was just working on merging Barry's comments with Dave's and Kurt's. > > I attached what should be correct. I would like someone to just double > check my work. > > tim > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 4:35 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> These all work for me. Thanks for the contributions. >> >> Scott, please work your magic with a revision so the chairs can request >> publication and we can get this on its way. >> >> -MSK >> >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 9:13 AM Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 2/25/2021 8:41 AM, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote: >>> >>> Especially in the case of the PSD policies, one should not expect that >>> the controlling organization would necessarily be "a mail-originating >>> organization". Generally the idea is to *disavow* being such :-) >>> >>> Suggested alternate text: >>> >>> Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) >>> permits a domain-controlling >>> organization to express domain-level policies and preferences for >>> message validation, disposition, and reporting, >>> which a mail-receiving organization can use to improve mail handling. >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> d/ >>> >>> -- >>> Dave [email protected] >>> 408.329.0791 >>> >>> Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter >>> American Red [email protected] >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dmarc mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> dmarc mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >> >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
