On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 3:04 PM Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote:
> > In Section 1.1 "Example" > > OLD > > Defensively registering all variants of "tax" is obviously not a > scalable strategy. The intent of this specification, therefore, is > to enhance the DMARC algorithm by enabling an agent receiving such a > message to be able to determine that a relevant policy is present at > "gov.example", which is precluded by the current DMARC algorithm. > > > NEW > > Defensively registering all variants of "tax" is obviously not a > scalable strategy. The intent of this specification, therefore, is > to enhance the DMARC discovery method by enabling an agent receiving > such a message to be able to determine that a relevant policy is > present at "gov.example", which is precluded by the current DMARC > specification. > Tim, I still think that including the term "obviously" in the first sentence of this snippet is a pejorative judgemental statement which is out of place in a specification. Especially given that there are alternatives to "registering" any such domains at all via the use of "trick" DNS servers at the PSD level. --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
