Oh shoot y'all I removed "obviously" once, then accidentally added it back in.
My mistake. On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:41 AM Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> NEW >> >> Defensively registering all variants of "tax" is obviously not a >> scalable strategy. The intent of this specification, therefore, is >> to enhance the DMARC discovery method by enabling an agent receiving >> such a message to be able to determine that a relevant policy is >> present at "gov.example", which is precluded by the current DMARC >> specification. >> > > Tim, > > I still think that including the term "obviously" in the first sentence of > this snippet is a pejorative judgemental statement which is out of place in > a specification. Especially given that there are alternatives to > "registering" any such domains at all via the use of "trick" DNS servers at > the PSD level. > > > Even worse is the demonstrable fact that it is far from obvious to many > people and businesses. Buying up cousin domains remains an active line of > effort for (some) companies. > > Consequently, the requirement here is to explain why it isn't scalable, > rather than to simple assert the fact. > > > d/ > > -- > Dave [email protected] > 408.329.0791 > > Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter > Information & PLanning Coordinator > American Red [email protected] > >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
