On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 1:59 PM John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > It appears that Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> said: > >-=-=-=-=-=- > > > >All, > > > >This is the current text in Section 10.4 of dmarc-bis > > > > Names of DMARC tags must be registered with IANA in this new sub- > > registry. New entries are assigned only for values that have been > > documented in a manner that satisfies the terms of Specification > > Required, per [RFC8126]. Each registration must include the tag > > name; the specification that defines it; a brief description; and its > > status, which must be one of "current", "experimental", or > > "historic". The Designated Expert needs to confirm that the provided > > specification adequately describes the new tag and clearly presents > > how it would be used within the DMARC context by Domain Owners and > > Mail Receivers. > > > >I don't believe we can actually remove said tag from the IANA registry, > >but we can mark them as "historic", and remove the text from the > >new document. > > Marking it "historic" seems appropriate, since that'll keep future versions > of DMARC from using it for something else. > > -- > Regards, > John Levine, [email protected], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for > Dummies", > Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly >
+1 Michael Hammer
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
