Editors, I sent y'all a pull request.
Tim On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 2:35 PM Dotzero <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 1:59 PM John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It appears that Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> said: >> >-=-=-=-=-=- >> > >> >All, >> > >> >This is the current text in Section 10.4 of dmarc-bis >> > >> > Names of DMARC tags must be registered with IANA in this new sub- >> > registry. New entries are assigned only for values that have been >> > documented in a manner that satisfies the terms of Specification >> > Required, per [RFC8126]. Each registration must include the tag >> > name; the specification that defines it; a brief description; and its >> > status, which must be one of "current", "experimental", or >> > "historic". The Designated Expert needs to confirm that the provided >> > specification adequately describes the new tag and clearly presents >> > how it would be used within the DMARC context by Domain Owners and >> > Mail Receivers. >> > >> >I don't believe we can actually remove said tag from the IANA registry, >> >but we can mark them as "historic", and remove the text from the >> >new document. >> >> Marking it "historic" seems appropriate, since that'll keep future >> versions >> of DMARC from using it for something else. >> >> -- >> Regards, >> John Levine, [email protected], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for >> Dummies", >> Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly >> > > +1 > > Michael Hammer > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
