One of the points of "deprecation" is that we don't eliminate it entirely, but say that it's no longer used. New implementations no longer generate it, but implementations that are interested in backward compatibility will still include support for it on receipt.
Eventually, when we see that its use is rare enough, the community might move to no longer include support (no longer needing backward compatibility). But I expect that support on receipt would remain for some time. Barry On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 2:52 PM Benny Pedersen <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2021-07-20 19:16, Dotzero wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:39 PM Dave Crocker <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> On 7/20/2021 7:54 AM, Barry Leiba wrote: > >>> I would like to see us deprecate PCT entirely, > >> +1 > > +1 > > if this was postfix it would not be accepted, old habist must stay to be > backward compatible, sadly not all understand why > > with all that changes it could end with no one uses this good software > writed after c code i provided :( > > hope for there LTS of it all > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
