Seems like a reasonable way to do it. Please consider the environment before reading this message. John Levine, [email protected]
> On Jul 20, 2021, at 23:47, tjw ietf <[email protected]> wrote: > > I like Dave’s idea here about leaving them changing their value to none. > > > > Sent from my iPhone > >>> On Jul 20, 2021, at 22:45, Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 7/20/2021 7:04 PM, John Levine wrote: >>> I suppose we should have a Former DMARC Tags registry to prevent them >>> from being recycled with a different meaning. >> >> >> Or keep the current entry, changing the specification citation to NONE, or >> even just keep the existing one. >> >> d/ >> >> -- >> Dave Crocker >> [email protected] >> 408.329.0791 >> >> Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter >> Information & Planning Coordinator >> American Red Cross >> [email protected] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dmarc mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc > _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
