I don't understand your user experience argument, because the proposed UX would be very different from the current UX. Nor do I think that security should be compromised for user convenience. But I am ready to withdraw the proposal.
The substantive argument is the problem of trust in list operators. My proposal made list infrastructure significantly more complex, and allowed list operators to intercept member-to-member communication. This creates an incentive for nation-state intelligence agencies and big tech privacy violators to move into management of lists. I underestimated that risk, and it creates a veto. Doug foster On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 12:30 AM Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote: > If we were the voting sort, my vote would be "rewriting from is a horrible > hack that destroys UX". That should be sufficient information. > > Scott K > > >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
